Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Overview of studies presenting preference based HRQL weights for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. |
|||||||
|
Author |
Setting |
AIDS population |
Sub-analyses |
VAS1) |
TTO |
SG |
EQ-5D index |
|
|
|||||||
|
Hughes |
South Africa |
WHO stages 3 or 4 |
General community |
0.80 |
|||
|
(2004) |
(Cape Town) |
or CD4<200 |
Awaiting ART |
0.60 |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
Jelsma |
South Africa |
WHO stages 3 or 4 |
General community |
0.80 |
|||
|
(2005) |
(Cape Town) |
or CD4<200 |
Awaiting ART |
0.62 |
|||
|
ART (1 month) |
0.70 |
||||||
|
ART (3 months) |
0.71 |
||||||
|
ART (6 months) |
0.74 |
||||||
|
ART (12 months) |
0.76 |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Louwagie |
South Africa |
WHO stage 4 or |
ART (own health) |
0.66 |
0.80 |
||
|
(2007) |
(Free State) |
CD4<200 |
Awaiting ART |
0.62 |
0.69 |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
Lara |
Uganda |
WHO stages |
Own health (ART and non ART) |
0.50 and 0.55 |
|||
|
(2008) |
(Entebbe) |
2, 3 or 4 |
WHO stage 2 (ART and non ART) |
0.59 and 0.63 |
0.75 and 0.78 |
0.50 and 0.51 |
|
|
WHO stage 3 (ART and non ART) |
0.39 and 0.39 |
0.49 and 0.52 |
0.34 and 0.39 |
||||
|
WHO stage 4 (ART and non ART) |
0.17 and 0.15 |
0.20 and 0.27 |
0.19 and 0.19 |
||||
|
Own health reassessed (ART and non ART) |
0.78 and 0.66 |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
1) VAS scores transformed from 0-100 scale to 0-1 scale to improve comparability. |
|||||||
|
Robberstad and Olsen Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2010 8:5 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-8-5 |
|||||||