Table 3 |
||||||
|
Cost-effectiveness for varying subsidy and compliance rates |
||||||
|
Compliance Rate |
100% |
75% |
50% |
25% |
20% |
10% |
|
|
||||||
|
Health loss (DALYs) averted |
6,286 |
4,844 |
3,322 |
1,710 |
1377 |
697 |
|
Health expenditure averted ($ Million) |
53 |
35 |
24 |
13 |
10 |
5 |
|
Cost effectiveness ($/DALY) with 20$ subsidy |
(810)e |
2,649 |
7,162 |
20,747 |
27,546 |
61,558 |
|
Cost effectiveness ($/DALY) with 25$ subsidy |
1,099 |
5,126 |
10,775 |
27,762 |
36,263 |
78,781 |
|
Cost effectiveness ($/DALY) with 50$ subsidy |
10,644 |
17,511 |
28,835 |
62,840 |
79,848 |
164,896 |
|
|
||||||
|
(.)e, indicates a dominant strategy where benefits gained or the value of burden avoided exceeds cost of subsidy. |
||||||
|
Amarasinghe Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2010 8:10 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-8-10 |
||||||
