Table 2

Descriptive statistics of the 245 interventions

No. Interventions (%)Total 245

Patient/disease characteristics

AR-DRGs
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue
33 (13)

Mental diseases and disorders
32 (13)

Alcohol or drug use
29 (12)

Circulatory system
22 (9)

Endocrine nutritional and metabolic disorder/disease
20 (8)

Infectious and parasitic diseases
20 (8)

Other
89 (36)
Target Age
Children aged 0 to 14 years
34 (14)

Young adults age 14 to 25 years
5 (2)

Working age adults 25 to 65 years
14 (6)

Elderly aged 65+ years
20 (8)

Children and young adults aged 0 to 25 years
2 (1)

Young adults and adults aged 14 to 65 years
63 (26)

Adults and elderly aged 25 to 65 plus years
92 (38)

All
11 (5)

Mixture of the above groups
4 (2)
Target population
Specific
200 (82)

General population
45 (18)
Ability to reduce own risk
To some extent
123 (50)

No
122 (50)
Condition caused by patients' own behaviour
To some extent
127 (52)

No
118 (48)

Intervention details

Type
Medical
177 (72)

Lifestyle
68 (28)
Objective
Treatment
119 (49)

Prevention
78 (32)

Screening
33 (14)

Diagnosis
7 (3)

Combination
8 (3)
Prevention stage
Primary (completely avert disease)
78 (32)

Secondary (slow/halt progression of disease)
119 (49)

Tertiary (limit disability after harm)
48 (20)
Modality
Pharmaceutical
52 (21)

Primary medical care or specialist care
65 (27)

Community/media/education
39 (16)

Hospital inpatient
26 (11)

Vaccination
17 (7)

Allied health
29 (12)

Combination of modalities
9 (4)

Other
8 (3)

Nature of publication & study methodology

Year of publication
Median (range)
2002 (1989 to 2005)
Strength of evidence
Strong-RCT/meta-analysis
132 (54)

Limited
113 (46)
Where published
Peer reviewed journal
185 (76)

Government report
18 (7)

Other peer-reviewed report
26 (11)

Other non peer reviewed report
16 (7)
Publication type
General medicine
52 (21)

Specialist medicine
85 (35)

Health economics/policy/HTA/public health
108 (44)
Perspective
Health system
212 (87)

Societal
33 (14)
Measure of Outcome
Life year
79 (32)

QALY
119 (49)

DALY
46 (19)

HYE
1 (1)
Discount rate
0%
27 (13)

3%
22 (10)

5%
190 (78)

Missing
12 (6)
Time horizon of the model in years
Median
15

Interquartile range
1 to 25

Missing
89 (36)
Duration of benefit in years
Median
4

Interquartile range
1 to 6

Missing
81 (33)
Downstream costs/savings
Included
140 (57)

Quality

Q-Comparator
Appropriate
215 (88)
Q-Costs
Appropriate (marginal and clear)
185 (76)
Q-Sensitivity analysis
Performed
239 (98)
Q-Overall
Met all three requirements above
173 (71)

Cost effectiveness


More effective but more costly
214 (87)

Median
$19,017

Interquartile range
$5,997 to $45,670

Dominated
11 (5)

Dominant
20 (8)

Funding & implementation

Funding status
Fully funded
87 (35)

Partially funded
75 (31)

Not funded
83 (34)
Patients required to make contribution to costs
Yes
178 (73)

Dalziel et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2008 6:9   doi:10.1186/1478-7547-6-9

Open Data