|
Annual transition probabilities for the natural history model |
||||
| Parameters |
Age |
Transition probability |
Time period |
References |
|
|
||||
| Normal |
||||
| Uninfected to Cervical HPV infection (HPV incidence) |
10–12 |
0.0000 |
12 months |
Calibrated from Canfell et al17 |
| 13 |
0.0100 |
12 months |
||
| 14 |
0.0300 |
12 months |
||
| 15 |
0.0400 |
12 months |
||
| 16 |
0.0460 |
12 months |
||
| 17 |
0.0700 |
12 months |
||
| 18 |
0.0700 |
12 months |
||
| 19 |
0.1700 |
12 months |
||
| 20–21 |
0.2000 |
12 months |
||
| 22 |
0.1200 |
12 months |
||
| 23 |
0.1100 |
12 months |
||
| 24–29 |
0.0850 |
12 months |
||
| 30–33 |
0.0320 |
12 months |
||
| 34–49 |
0.0170 |
12 months |
||
| 50+ |
0.0095 |
12 months |
||
| HPV infected state |
||||
| Progression from HPV infection to SIL – all risk HPV |
0.0959 |
12 months |
Canfell et al17 |
|
| Percentage CIN 2 among SIL |
0.1350 |
12 months |
Calibrated based on Myers et al12 and Canfell et al17 |
|
| Regression of CIN 1 to normal from HPV infection |
12–24 |
0.7000 |
18 months |
Calibrated based on Myers et al12 and Canfell et al17 |
| 25–29 |
0.5000 |
18 months |
||
| 30–39 |
0.4000 |
18 months |
||
| 40–49 |
0.2700 |
18 months |
||
| 50+ |
0.1000 |
18 months |
||
| CIN 1 |
Canfell et al17 |
|||
| Progression from CIN 1 to CIN 2 – all risk HPV |
16–34 |
0.0297 |
12 months |
|
| 35+ |
0.1485 |
12 months |
||
| Progression from CIN 1 to CIN 3 – all risk HPV |
0.0301 |
12 months |
||
| Regression to HPV infected state – all risk HPV |
16–34 |
0.2248 |
12 months |
|
| 35+ |
0.1124 |
12 months |
||
| Proportion regressing to normal |
0.9000 |
12 months |
||
| CIN 2 |
Canfell et al17 |
|||
| Progression from CIN 2 to CIN 3 |
16–34 |
0.0389 |
12 months |
|
| 35–44 |
0.0797 |
12 months |
||
| 45+ |
0.1062 |
12 months |
||
| Regression from CIN 2 to CIN 1 |
0.2430 |
12 months |
||
| Regression from CIN 2 to uninfected or HPV infections |
0.1901 |
12 months |
||
| Proportion regressing directly to normal |
0.9000 |
12 months |
||
| CIN 3 |
Canfell et al17 |
|||
| Regression CIN 3 to CIN 1 – all risk HPV |
0.0000 |
12 months |
||
| Regression from CIN 3 to CIN 2 – all risk HPV |
0.0135 |
12 months |
||
| CIN 3 to uninfected or HPV infection |
16–44 |
0.0135 |
12 months |
|
| 45+ |
0.0100 |
12 months |
||
| Proportion CIN 3 regressing directly to uninfected |
0.5000 |
12 months |
||
| Proportion CIN 3 progressing to FIGO I cancer |
0.0127 |
12 months |
||
| Cervical cancer |
Myers et al12 |
|||
| FIGO 1 |
||||
| Progression rates |
0.9000 |
48 months |
||
| Probability of symptoms |
0.1850 |
12 months |
||
| FIGO 2 |
||||
| Progression rates |
0.9000 |
36 months |
||
| Probability of symptoms |
0.3000 |
12 months |
||
| FIGO 3 |
||||
| Progression rates |
0.9000 |
15 months |
||
| Probability of symptoms |
0.7500 |
12 months |
||
| FIGO 4 |
||||
| Probability of symptoms |
0.8000 |
12 months |
||
| Annual probability of survival after diagnosis, FIGO 1 |
Cancer Research UK 21 |
|||
| 1 Year survival |
0.977 |
12 months |
||
| 2 Year survival |
0.978 |
12 months |
||
| 3 Year survival |
0.963 |
12 months |
||
| 4 Year survival |
0.988 |
12 months |
||
| 5 Year survival |
0.988 |
12 months |
||
| Annual probability of survival after diagnosis, FIGO 2 |
||||
| 1 Year survival |
0.830 |
12 months |
||
| 2 Year survival |
0.835 |
12 months |
||
| 3 Year survival |
0.755 |
12 months |
||
| 4 Year survival |
0.870 |
12 months |
||
| 5 Year survival |
0.899 |
12 months |
||
| Annual probability of survival after diagnosis, FIGO 3 |
||||
| 1 Year survival |
0.590 |
12 months |
||
| 2 Year survival |
0.693 |
12 months |
||
| 3 Year survival |
0.778 |
12 months |
||
| 4 Year survival |
0.928 |
12 months |
||
| 5 Year survival |
0.963 |
12 months |
||
| Annual probability of survival after diagnosis, FIGO 4 |
||||
| 1 Year survival |
0.523 |
12 months |
||
| 2 Year survival |
0.782 |
12 months |
||
| 3 Year survival |
0.721 |
12 months |
||
| 4 Year survival |
0.925 |
12 months |
||
| 5 Year survival |
0.956 |
12 months |
||
Kulasingam et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2008 6:4 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-6-4 |
||||