Table 4 |
|||
|
Sensitivity Analyses of the Lifetime* AMD-related† Benefits of Quitting for 1,000 Randomly Selected Smokers‡, and Cost-Effectiveness of a Tobacco Control Program.§. |
|||
|
Model Variable |
Lifetime AMD-related Benefits of Quitting |
Cost per QALY gained (assuming a cost per quitter of $1,400) |
|
|
|
|||
|
QALYs gained |
Costs (excluding caregivers) $ |
$ |
|
|
|
|||
|
Slope parameter (τ), which is inversely proportional to the rate of decline in the risk of AMD after quitting relative to current-smokers |
|||
|
Upper 95% confidence Limit (slower decline) |
1,600 |
-774,000 |
391 |
|
Lower 95% confidence Limit (faster decline) |
1,623 |
-1,426,000 |
Dominant |
|
Higher utilities for reduced visual acuity¶ |
1,600 |
-1,082,000 |
199 |
|
Ranibizumab treatment of neovascular AMD|| |
|||
|
Base-case scenario, as in Table 3, but: |
|||
|
low ranibizumab cost |
1611 |
-360,000 |
645 |
|
50% of neovascular patients treated |
1613 |
-732,000 |
414 |
|
Sustained-effect scenario, low ranibizumab cost |
1610 |
-282,000 |
694 |
|
Non-sustained effect scenario, high ranibizumab cost |
1611 |
-929,000 |
292 |
|
|
|||
|
* Censored at age 85 years † AMD: Age-related macular degeneration ‡ From the U.S. population of smokers in 2004–2005[10] §Costs are in 2004 U.S. dollars and were rounded. Costs, blind-years and QALYs were discounted at 3% per annum ¶Source: Brown et al., estimated with standard gamble method.[25] For 30 letters read, for example, utility = 0.71, rather than 0.52 in the base case. || Base-case, Sustained-effect and Non-sustained effect scenarios as defined in previous paper.[7] Low ranibizumab cost = bevazicumab price ($50 per dose). High ranibizumab price = wholesale price ($1,950 per dose). |
|||
|
Hurley et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2008 6:18 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-6-18 |
|||