Table 6 |
||||||
|
Costs, incremental costs and cost-effectiveness ratios* for ranibizumab treatment compared with no ranibizumab treatment for a 67-year old woman over a 10-year time horizon, under different treatment effectiveness and dosing scenarios. |
||||||
|
Scenario |
Cost |
Cost per case of blindness prevented |
Cost per blind-year prevented |
Cost per QALY gained |
||
|
Ranibizumab treatment |
No ranibizumab treatment |
Difference |
||||
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Base-case scenario |
||||||
|
Including caregiver costs |
||||||
|
Ranibizumab cost |
||||||
|
Wholesale price |
205,800 |
238,300 |
-32,500 |
Dominant† |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Bevacizumab price |
147,100 |
238,300 |
-91,100 |
Dominant |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Excluding caregiver costs |
||||||
|
Ranibizumab cost |
||||||
|
Wholesale price |
88,800 |
26,300 |
62,400 |
217,700 |
29,200 |
91,900 |
|
Bevacizumab price |
30,100 |
26,300 |
3,800 |
13,200 |
1,800 |
5,600 |
|
Sustained-effect scenario |
||||||
|
Including caregiver costs |
||||||
|
Ranibizumab cost |
||||||
|
Wholesale price |
144,400 |
238,300 |
-93,800 |
Dominant |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Bevacizumab price |
125,500 |
238,300 |
-112,700 |
Dominant |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Excluding caregiver costs |
||||||
|
Ranibizumab cost |
||||||
|
Wholesale price |
42,200 |
26,300 |
15,900 |
41,100 |
6,400 |
20,300 |
|
Bevacizumab price |
23,300 |
26,300 |
-3,000 |
Dominant |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Non-sustained-effect scenario |
||||||
|
Including caregiver costs |
||||||
|
Ranibizumab cost |
||||||
|
Wholesale price |
209,800 |
238,300 |
-28,500 |
Dominant |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Bevacizumab price |
164,800 |
238,300 |
-73,500 |
Dominant |
Dominant |
Dominant |
|
Excluding caregiver costs |
||||||
|
Ranibizumab cost |
||||||
|
Wholesale price |
74,000 |
26,300 |
47,700 |
218,600 |
27,900 |
86,900 |
|
Bevacizumab price |
29,100 |
26,300 |
2,700 |
12,500 |
1,600 |
5,000 |
|
|
||||||
|
*Costs are in 2004 U.S. dollars and were rounded. Costs, blind-years and QALYs were discounted at 3% per annum † Dominant: Ranibizumab treatment was more effective and cost less than the no ranibizumab strategy |
||||||
|
Hurley et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2008 6:12 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-6-12 |
||||||