|
Sample means of the annual expenditure, coverage, project age and annual rent paid by target group and agency, from the Andhra Pradesh financial dataset (N = 78) (range) |
||||||||||
| Target group* |
"Agency": Management agency at recruitment of NGO & batch of recruitment ** |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Total |
Non-vulnerable |
Vulnerable |
t test, p value |
APSACS1 |
APSACS2 |
HHP |
SMA1 |
SMA2 |
ANOVA p value |
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Total expenditure INR 000s |
689.2 (40.85–1,581) |
663.8 (40.85–1,581) |
746.3 (528.1–1,246.9) |
0.9375 |
677.1 (40.9–1,457.3) |
639.2 (418.3–1,581) |
822.2 (474.4–1,091) |
767.3 (467.5–1,247) |
695.0 (528.1–1,046) |
0.185 |
| No. of people reached |
5,647 (675–24,111) |
6,809 (993–24,111) |
3,034 (675–14,871) |
0.0004^^^ |
6,611 (993–13,955) |
6,064 (1,027–17,614) |
18,624 (14,390–24,111) |
3,479 (1,555–14,871) |
2,525 (675–7,099) |
0.255 |
| Expenditure per person reached, INR |
224.5 (11.6–939.1 |
143.0 (11.6–592.6) |
408.0 (74.3–939.1) |
1.000 |
139.5 (11.6–529.0) |
147.7 (35.4–592.6) |
46.8 (27.3–75.8) |
314.8 (74.3–748.4) |
466.0 (107.0–939.1) |
0.000^^^ |
| Project age, yrs*** |
2.72 (2.1–5.6) |
2.60 (2.1–5.6) |
3 (2.1–3.92) |
0.9724 |
2.5 (0) |
2.25 (0) |
5.59 (0) |
3.92 (0) |
2.08 (0) |
n/a |
| Rent, INR |
48,480 (0–90,338) |
44,937 (0–71,540) |
56,452 (31,399–90,338) |
0.997 |
44,542 (0–61,891) |
45,057 (19,905–65,388) |
48,699 (29,680–71,541) |
56,164 (31,281–72,677) |
53,664 (43,059–90,338) |
0.168 |
| Sample size |
78 |
54 |
24 |
22 |
26 |
3 |
14 |
13 |
||
|
*"Vulnerable group" projects include those for commercial sex workers (CSW), street children (SC), transgenders (TG) and men who have sex with men (MSM); "Non vulnerable group" projects are those for truckers, mobile populations and slum dwellers. ** Prior to 2001, the targeted interventions were funded and managed by 3 different projects – Andhra Pradesh State AIDS Control Society (APSACS); Department for International Development UK (DFID) supported Healthy Highways Project (HHP); and the DFID supported State Management Agency (SMA). The dummies represent these 3 different projects and that both APSACS and SMA recruited NGOs in 2 separate batches.***Projects started at the same time within each "agency" group. ^^^significant at the 99% confidence level; ^^significant at the 95% confidence level; ^significant at the 90% confidence level. | ||||||||||
Guinness et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2007 5:13 doi:10.1186/1478-7547-5-13 |
||||||||||